Prediction of Mark Dickson vs Danie Visser Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Dickson vs D. Visser
Mark Dickson
USA
w
w
w
l
l
l
w
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
66
Age
64
-
Height
5'11" (180 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
32
Best Rank
59
2
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
Left-Handed
Danie Visser
RSA
w
l
l
w
l
w
l
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
66
Age
64
-
Height
5'11" (180 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
32
Best Rank
59
2
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
Left-Handed
Head-to-head: Dickson 1 - 0 Visser
They have played 3 sets in total, with Mark Dickson winning 3 and Danie Visser winning 0. The last match between Mark Dickson and Danie Visser was at the US Open, 30-08-1983, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Mark Dickson getting the victory 6-3 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Dickson | 1 |
| Visser | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R3) US Open(08-30-83)
Mark Dickson
6
6
6
Danie Visser
3
4
4
M. Dickson vs D. Visser H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 55.97% (178-140) | Career Total W/L | 44.05% (111-141) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 4 | Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Dickson vs D. Visser Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mark Dickson has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Danie Visser has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mark Dickson, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Danie Visser has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mark Dickson has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Danie Visser has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mark Dickson has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Danie Visser winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mark Dickson has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 85/51), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 48/47). Danie Visser has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 3/1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 26% (W/L 6/17).
- Player level: In the last year, Mark Dickson has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Danie Visser has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mark Dickson winning 1 times and Danie Visser being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Mark Dickson winning 3 and Danie Visser winning 0.
- The last match between Mark Dickson and Danie Visser was at the US Open, 30-08-1983, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Mark Dickson getting the victory 6-3 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mark Dickson has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Danie Visser has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mark Dickson has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Danie Visser has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mark Dickson has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Danie Visser has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Mark Dickson vs Danie Visser Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Dickson vs D. Visser H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 18 | Games Won | 11 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑5 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Dickson 0%, Visser 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Dickson 0%, Visser 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Dickson 0%, Visser 0%.
M. Dickson Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Montreal / Toronto - 08-08-1988 | ||||
R2 Leif ShirasL. Shiras | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Indianapolis - 01-08-1988 | ||||
R4 Michael RobertsonM. Robertson | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R3 Tim MayotteT. Mayotte | W | 7-6 6-3 | ||
R2  David LewisD. Lewis | W | 6-2 7-6 | ||
| Stratton Mountain - 25-07-1988 | ||||
R2 Michael ChangM. Chang | L | 4-6 6-1 6-2 | ||
D. Visser Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Berlin - 07-10-1991 | ||||
R1  Udo RiglewskiU. Riglewski | L | 7-6(3) 6-7(9) 6-4 | ||
| Cincinnati - 05-08-1991 | ||||
R1  Ronald AgenorR. Agenor | W | 6-4 3-6 7-6(2) | ||
R2 Michael ChangM. Chang | L | 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Berlin - 08-10-1990 | ||||
R2  Milan SrejberM. Srejber | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R1  Franco DavinF. Davin | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
M. Dickson vs D. Visser Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.97% (178/140) | YTD Win/Loss | 44.05% (111/141) |
| 55.15% (439/357) | Sets Win/Loss | 46.67% (315/360) |
| 51.77% (3982/3709) | Games Win/Loss | 49.16% (3314/3427) |
| 50.53% (48/47) | Hard Win/Loss | 45.19% (61/74) |
| 62.50% (85/51) | Clay Win/Loss | 26.09% (6/17) |
| 50.00% (34/34) | Indoor Hard W/L | 48.00% (12/13) |
| 57.89% (11/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 46.38% (32/37) |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 431.69 | Average Opponent Rank | 379.74 |
| 47.62% (10/11) | Slam W/L | 48.94% (23/24) |
| 52.94% (9/8) | Masters W/L | 41.38% (12/17) |
| 52.40% (109/99) | Main Tour W/L | 39.31% (57/88) |
| 69.44% (50/22) | Challenger W/L | 61.29% (19/12) |
| 57% (166/290) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 43% (85/199) |
| 40% (10/25) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 48% (25/52) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 67% (2/3) |
| 48% (59/124) | Deciding Set Win % | 42% (37/89) |
| 76% (196/149) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 72% (121/87) |
| 23% (196/46) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 28% (121/34) |
| 22% (121/27) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (130/23) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Fri, 12 Dec, 07:40 PM
Prediction
P. DelageR. Dickerson8W1
1.85
W2
1.83
Sat, 13 Dec, 01:00 AM
Prediction
T. Sach3K. Smith2W1
3.48
W2
1.25
Fri, 12 Dec, 07:50 PM
PredictionL. J. Rodriguez1
J. GuillemeqW1
1.141
W2
4.75
Sat, 13 Dec, 02:00 AM
PredictionS. Webb6I. HoughtonqW1
1.5
W2
2.375
Sat, 13 Dec, 06:30 PM
Prediction
C. Bucsa1
A. KalininaW1
1.55
W2
2.26
Sat, 13 Dec, 01:00 AM
Prediction
K. Nishimura5S. RokusekW1
1.36
W2
2.84
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
12 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Anna Siskova vs Elsa Jacquemot Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 12th December 2025 Best Bets
12 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Cristina Bucsa vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 12th December 2025 Best Bets
12 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Cristina Bucsa vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 12th December 2025 Best Bets
12 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Anhelina Kalinina vs Alycia Parks Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 12th December 2025 Best Bets
11 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Shuai Zhang vs Anna-Lena Friedsam Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 11th December 2025 Best Bets
11 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Gabriela Andrea Knutson vs Elsa Jacquemot Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 11th December 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions TodayCristina BucsaAnhelina KalininaToby Alex KodatOriol Roca BatallaSee All Today’s Tennis Predictions
Cristina BucsaAnhelina Kalinina18:30
H2H 0-0
Toby Alex KodatOriol Roca Batalla22:05
H2H 0-0
